I’m off: jBlog has now moved

After two fun years, jBlog is now moving to a nice new host. And, since I never liked having a dot org anyway, I’ve got a new domain too.

So, please alter your bookmarks accordingly:

www.daveleejblog.com is the new address

http://feeds.feedburner.com/daveleejblog is the new RSS feed

I had hoped I’d be able to just re-direct all the traffic from here to my new domain, but there were complications. Not to worry — I hope to see you all at my new home.

Moving hosts and domain

I’ve had it with Web-Mania. If anyone is Googling for webhosts and thinking of using them, I’d stay well clear. In a word: useless. They’ll quote the site uptime as over 99%, but if you hope to host a site making use of MySQL (so that’s everyone, then) you’ve got no chance.

I’ve struggled through for long enough. As soon as it clears, I’m moving everything over to www.daveleejblog.com. I’ve always wanted a .com, and it seems daveleejblog is probably better known than just Dave Lee anyway.

I have a question, though. I realise a huge amount of Google/referral hits will still come to this domain (dave-lee.org). Is there anyway I can set something up so that any traffic to this site is automatically forwarded to my new site?

Can I even maintain the URL structure?

For example, if someone was to Google this post, they’d have a url like this:

http://www.dave-lee.org/jblog/index.php/2008/10/how-should-we-be-using-twitter/

Is it possible to set up something that’ll, without even the user knowing, take them to this URL instead:

http://www.daveleejblog.com/index.php/2008/10/how-should-we-be-using-twitter/

I will be importing all my posts/categories and suchlike to my new address, so structure should stay the same.

Any thoughts?

Selling the BBC licence fee to the public (and Terry Tibbs)

A few media commentators have used the Brand/Ross fall out to take swipes at the BBC licence fee. I fear it’s a debate that will escalate even more now that Jonathan Ross has been suspended for 12 weeks, an admission that the presenter got it very, very wrong.

I feel I’ll struggle to show objectivity with this post, given my current career developments, but hopefully people who know me can verify that my admiration of the BBC has existed for a long time — not just in the past few weeks.

When I taught in New Zealand, I introduced the BBC website as being the greatest news organisation on earth. Several students expressed their envy at not having such a well-respected public broadcaster on their own shores.

So why do I constantly come across opinion pieces, comments and blogs rallying fiercely against the £131.50 yearly fee? Do we really believe it isn’t good value for money?

The fact that we pay the wages of both Brand and Ross seems to have added an unwelcome fuel to this current fire. Anyone resents having to pay compulsory fees for anything; even something we enjoy as much as television and radio. Surprisingly, though, millions upon millions of us think nothing of paying the fee amount three for four times over to receive Sky Sports. Ironically, if the licence fee were higher, BBC Sport would be able to compete in that arena too.

It’s not often I agree with Noel Edmonds, but a while ago he made a terrific point about the BBC licence fee. Here it is (from the Independent):

Edmonds claimed his one-man protest was against the corporation’s “we know where you are” ad campaigns against those who didn’t have a TV licence, which he argued were threatening.

Spot on my shoddy-shirt wearing friend. The TV Licensing adverts are disgusting. They’re said in the same grumped-up tone as the adverts on benefit fraud. The psychology is all wrong. The BBC shouldn’t just be telling payers that they have to pay, they should be shouting about why it’s good to pay. What am I getting? Where’s the benefit? Where does my fee go?

Fonejacker — brilliant show about, topically enough, prank calling — has a wonderful character named Terry Tibbs. Terry is your old-school business man. And, ridiculous as he is, he could have some choice words when it comes to persuading people that the licence fee is worth it. In one sketch, he says this about buying a car:

“Hang about. Look. We’re not talkin’ money jus yet. Alright? I wanna know a bit more about the car before we get into that. Come on, you gotta seduce me. You don’t just jump into bed with Terry Tibbs. You take Terry Tibbs out to lunch. You wine and dine him. You give him an oil massage, and then he gives you nineteen-fifty, if you’re lucky.”

Now while that may just be an excuse to mention Terry Tibbs in a blog post, I think if the BBC imagined Terry when pushing TV licence adverts, there’d be a lot more enthuasiasm for our public broadcaster.

Rather than: “We’ll find you.” They should be saying: “Look what you’re getting, isn’t it brilliant?”

Yesterday, I visited a friend in Norwich. While I was there, I went to the wonderful new BBC building. In it was a library, cafes, studios… loads of stuff. Around the floor, stalls sold products for charity or small business. It was packed out — on a Wednesday. It’s just one small example of the goodness an organisation like the BBC can bring.

Think of the licence fee as a tax on a nation’s intellectual well-being. We pay tax to keep our roads in order. We pay tax to keep our health service running. Personally, I think a tax that ensures knowledge, entertainment and world class journalism is just as valid. Let’s never forget how important it is.

Sure, you may not like Russell Brand. That’s fine. Millions of people, however, do like Russell Brand, making the money paid for his services justified. The same can be said for Jonathan Ross, too.

I don’t like Cash in the Attic all that much, but I don’t object to my licence fee going towards it because I know many people do.

If we can get the public to understand all the goodness that comes from the BBC licence fee, then the battle to regain faith is almost complete. The first step is some positive fee-related adverts. Seduce me.

Russell Brand: Analysis or overkill?

Wowzers. Take a look at this list of stories on the Russell Brand fiasco, all taken from Media Guardian. There’s 49 in total — and that’s before the inevitable truckload of posts that will follow now that Brand has resigned. I predict we’ll hit the 100 mark by the end of the week.

None of the links I’ve added here have been online for more than four days. Can anyone honestly say there has been this many developments? I don’t think so.

There’s analysis, and then there’s just anal. Enough of this madness.

Web-savvy standup with a licence to thrill and offend
Puerile prank that left BBC stars and executives on the ropes
Suited and booted: fall and rise of a showman
Patrick Barkham on Russell Brand’s ‘Hare Krishna’ chant and temple visits
Georgina Baillie: the Satanic Slut at the centre of the Ross-Brand controversy
Video: Russell Brand quits as BBC radio host
John Harris: What they did was grotesque
Andrew Sachs: profile
Russell Brand resigns from BBC as Jonathan Ross apologises for ‘juvenile remarks’
Video: Andrew Sachs on Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand: ‘I’m not collecting apologies’
Maggie Brown: Suspension is not enough for Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand
Broadcast rules should have saved BBC
In pictures: ‘Sachsgate’ - who’s who in the BBC hierarchy
Media Monkey: more from Sachsgate
‘Sachsgate’ – who’s who in the BBC hierarchy?

Loads more after the jump…
Read more »

My blog may get naked at any moment

If this page appears to be severely underformatted, please bear with me. I’m sorting out some theme bugs.

My new job at the BBC (and what it means)

Today I spent my first day with the BBC Future Media and Technology team. From 4th November I will be co-editor of the BBC Internet Blog, a behind the scenes take on how the BBC is trying to keep on top of technological developments in news gathering, production and publication.

Exciting times. I can’t begin to describe how much I’m looking forward to shedding some ideas across the BBC. Hopefully I can make an impact.

We already have some pretty cool projects on the go. I’ll be posting more about those at another time. What I’m looking to mention quickly now is what I hope to achieve with my work on the BBC Internet Blog. And, as I’ve done in every step of my career, I’d like to draw on the blogosphere’s input.

My main aim, and one that is shared enthusiastically by everyone I’ve met at the Beeb so far, is to immerse the BBC actively into social media. We do it well already, I reckon, but we can still come leaps and bounds to best make use of what’s out there.

I’ll be aiming to ramp up the use of del.icio.us and other similar services, so long as it’s useful to readers.

I’ll be looking for ways to help organise all the personal output from BBC journalists. There are loads of brilliant bloggers at the BBC who write in an extra-curricular fashion. I think this content needs to be publicised heavily. Why? Because it’s informative, it’s useful and, when we consider who funds the BBC, it’s very important. Not to mention interesting.

All in all, I think I use some of my own knowledge to ramp up efforts with social media. And the BBC Internet Blog is the best place for it to begin. Suggestions welcome in the comments or by email.

If you’re wondering where this leaves jBlog, well fear not. I still have free reign to post here however I please. I am yet to read the blogging guidelines, but I’m told they are very reasonable.

And finally, I’d like to publically thank Martin Stabe for getting me involved with this position.

links for 2008-10-27

What do you call a man hiding in a bush? Russell.

Poor Russell Brand. Or perhaps not.

I often say that people are quick to tread on Russell Brand because they don’t like him. And that dislike ends up clouding their ability to judge if something was offensive or not — much in the same way that many of the Big Brother complaints after the whole Shilpa Shetty affair wanted the show to be pulled. Not because of the alleged racism and/or bullying, but because they just didn’t like it.

Likewise, I have to concede that I could be guilty of the opposite. I think Russell Brand is one of the smartest comedians we Brits have ever had the pleasure of producing. My love for his work may getting in the way of admitting that his phone call stunt was way out of line.

Twitter Charts: When do you tweet?

I’m normally the last to find these online tools, but Twitter Charts is an interesting one, I think.

It shows, in beautiful graphic format, what days of the week, and what times, any given username posts Twitter updates.

You can see mine by clicking below:

Twitter activity

My results don’t show any great times of heightened activity, although some spurts can be explained simply. Saturday at 3pm, for example, where I often text Cambridge United-themed updates as and when we score/concede etc.

And you’ll also see I’m a bit of a night owl. I’ve made more tweets at 2am than I have at midday.

What does your Twitter Chart say about you? Try it here.

links for 2008-10-26

Next Page »